Legal Opinion

Smith v. Preston

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 17, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, for breach of written contract. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County, the Hon. Samuel C. Stough, Judge, presiding. Judgment for defendant; appeal by plaintiff. Heard in this court at the October term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

This was an action of assumpsit by appellant against Ellen H. Preston, executrix, and John L. Preston and Alfred R. Edwards, executors of the estate of E. E. Preston, deceased, upon certain clauses of the following contract:

“ This agreement entered into between C. L. Smith, of Cleveland, Ohio, aüd E. E. Preston & Co., of Chicago, Illinois.

From the date above mentioned, the said C. L. Smith agrees to give said E. E. Preston & Co. the exclusive right of manufacturing and selling a certain improved hose attachment and swivel, patented August 20, 1889, patent JSTo. 409,512, and that he has not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Whitebreast Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Schneider v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Judy v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Snydacker v. Swan Land & Cattle Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Wolf v. National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morse v. GilletteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  2. Warden Coal Washing Co. v. MeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API