Legal Opinion
Mohr v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 10, 2006No. 2D05-2150PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
927 So.2d 1031 (2006)
Peter MOHR, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 2D05-2150.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 10, 2006.
Peter Mohr, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.
SALCINES, Judge.
Peter Mohr, in his petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), raises two grounds alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We grant the petition as it relates to one of the grounds raised therein, and we deny, without comment, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Downs v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Pausch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Riley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Wiles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Riley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009