Kennedy v. Fury
Supreme Court of the United States
A CONVEYANCE was made to A. in trust for B. and B. brought an ejectment on his own demise. Blair contended that the demise ought to have been laid in the name of A. in-as-much as the legal estate was in him.
1Opinion of the Court
But by
Atlee Justice, (M'Kean C. J. being absent)
the demise by B. is well enough. We have no Court of Equity here; and, therefore, unless the cestui que trust could bring an ejectment in his own name, he would be without remedy, in the case of an obstinate trustee.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Lessee of Simpson v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1806
- Pipher v. LodgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1827
- Bixler v. KunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828
- Lessee of Crunkelton v. EvertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1803
- Lessee of Frazer v. HallowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1805
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.