Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Gabel

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbraham N. Geller, J.

In this article 78 proceeding petitioner attacks the validity of the Rent Administrator’s promulgation of a regulation (§ 54, subd. e) governing the procedures with respect to relocation or stipend payments to be followed in cases wherein landlords meet the requirements of other sections of the regulations for removal or eviction.

*733Petitioner contends that, under that regulation, a tenant who seeks to review in this court an order of the Bent Administrator granting certificates of eviction can do so only upon 1 ‘ penalty ’ ’ of losing his statutory right to relocation.

His contention, briefly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 181 East 73rd Street Co. v. WeaverNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Rigg v. GabelNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Festa v. LeshenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Goldsmith v. GabelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API