Legal Opinion
Gibson v. Freeman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 2008No. 06-CV-601PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
Plaintiffs/appellants Eulane Gibson, Joh-netta Gibson, Jonathan Matthews, and Richard Byrd moved to enlarge the time for service of process on defendants/appel-lees Curtis Freeman and GEICO Insurance Company. The trial judge denied the motion, and the trial court dismissed the complaint pursuant to Super. Ct. Civ. R. ^m). 1 Plaintiffs/appellants then filed a motion for reconsideration, which the court denied, treating the motion as a motion to vacate the dismissal pursuant to Super. Ct. Civ. R. 41(b). In this appeal from denial of the motion to vacate, appellants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Margot Rendall-Speranza v. Edward A. NassimCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Farris v. ComptonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bulin v. SteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wagshal v. RiglerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bolton v. Bernabei & Katz, PLLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Neill v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Baba v. GoldsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc. v. Grunley Construction Company, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- Gerald G. Neill, Jr. v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board and Fraternal Order of Police, Metropolitan Police Department Labor CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014