Abercrombie v. Pell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
The complaint contained counts ex contractu, that is, four common counts, and a~ count ex delicto, in trover, for the conversion of a bale of cotton. The amount claimed in each of the common counts was $200, while the amount claimed in the trover count was $100.
In count A, the trover count, there is this averment: “The plaintiff avers that counts one, two, three and amended Count A are all pertaining to the same subject matter and growing out of the same transaction.”
The court overruled demurrers to count A, and the cause then proceeded to trial on three of the common counts,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Howton v. MathiasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Snedecor v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Williams v. McKissackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Mobile J. & K. C. R. R. v. Bay Shore Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Gillis v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Treadwell Ford, Inc. v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Atchley v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Nellis v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Hickman v. HannasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Atchley v. WoodAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950