Towslee v. Callanan

Dooley, J.,

¶ 12. dissenting. Viewed from any perspective, the result in this case is manifestly unfair, and the provision in the order, as interpreted by the majority, is perverse and indefensible. On *627this point, I strongly disagree with the majority decision that the result is not “unfair or unreasonable.” Ante, ¶ 10. The majority justifies the result, and the perverse term of the order, on the basis that the wording of the controlling provision, in context, requires it. In fact, the majority ignores the critical wording of the provision that controls this decision. Properly construed, the…