Legal Opinion

Hunt-Berlin Coal Co. v. McDonald Coal Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

An action of damages instituted by the McDonald Coal Company, a corporation, who will hereinafter be referred to ’as plaintiff, against the Hunt-Berlin Coal Company, a corporation, who will hereinafter be referred to as defendant, to recover damages for injury to a passenger automobile, the property of plaintiff, by reason of a collision with a coal truck of the defendant, which had been left in a disabled condition on Jackson avenue, a thoroughfare of the city of Memphis.

The ground of negligence relied upon by plaintiff for a recovery against defendant was that defendant had permitted its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  2. Currie v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. T. & P. R'y Co. v. TankersleyTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Gibson v. Bessemer & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Spelman v. DelanoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Sewell v. NewtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Scruggs v. DennisTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Siegrist Bakery Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fletcher v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API