Legal Opinion

Board of Hudson River Regulating District v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitmyer, J.

This is a proceeding, under article VII-A of the Conservation Law, to condemn a part of defendant railroad’s right of way, about half-way between the city of Gloversville and the village of Northville, Fulton county, this State, with stations and terminal facilities at the villages of Mayfield, Northville and Cranberry Creek, for the construction and maintenance of a dam and reservoir, at Conklingville, above the confluence of the Hudson and Sacandaga rivers, including lands to be used for the relocation of the existing State highway, where it will be flooded, and, also, where it will not be…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Utica v. Damiano, New York County Courts1959
  2. Claim of Collins v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API