Legal Opinion

Wilkes-Barre Hotel Co. v. Rust

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1934No. Appeal 34PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff brought suit upon a contract of subscription for $1,000 of the Second Mortgage Bonds of the Wilkes-Barre Hotel Company. Defendant filed an affidavit of defense and a supplementary affidavit and the court, after a motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, refused to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff; hence the appeal. ■

The gist of the defense is that $560,000 was to be subscribed, and the amount subscribed was padded by subscriptions that were not bona fide, specifying them. That the campaign was never closed and the defendant withdrew his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Brockway Motor Truck Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Hardysh v. YurkovskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilkes-Barre H. Co. v. HildebrandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Wilkes-Barre Hotel Co. v. HildebrandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API