Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Britton

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 29, 1997No. 96-1002; Crim.App. No. 31948Published

1ConcurrenceEffron, Judge

I concur in the majority opinion but write separately to suggest an alternative approach to address the significant amount of time and effort devoted to multiplicity litigation, which frequently produce results that do not have a significant impact on the interests of either an appellant or the Government, regardless of who prevails on appeal.

I. Background

Multiplicity litigation has been marked by instability in doctrine and ad hoc resolution of cases, reflecting military justice considerations that increase the potential for trials involving multiple charges. The concept of multiplicity…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API