Hixon v. Hetherington
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Chancery Court of Monroe. Heard before Hon. Charles Turner. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case has been, heretofore, before this •court — see Hetherington v. Hixon, 46 Ala. 297 — and it was then held that Mrs. Hetherington was not liable on the note .■and mortgage, to enforce the collection of which this bill was filed. The material facts of this case are as follows: John H. Hetherington, husband of appellee, was indebted to Mrs. Hixon by two promissory notes; one of two hundred ■ dollars, and the other of over four hundred. To the note last mentioned, the name of Mrs. Hetherington was signed -as a co-maker; but when she executed it she was a femmecovert, wife of said John…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rutledge's Adm'r v. Townsend, Crane & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1863
- Townsend v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Gwynn v. Hamilton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Hetherington v. HixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
3Cited by6 opinions
- Christie v. DurdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Pullman Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Agnew v. Walden & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Doss v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Dabbs v. LetsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.