Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. Boshart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1903No. Nos. 13,220-(200)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Harrison, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Action to determine adverse claims made by defendant to vacant and unoccupied real property to which plaintiff alleged ownership.

In August, 1893, one Edward O. Tuttle was the owner of a mortgage upon the premises in question. He caused it to be foreclosed under the power, and the property was bid in in his own name at the foreclosure sale October 4, 1893. All of the necessary papers were duly executed, including the sheriff’s certificate, and recorded on the same day. No redemption has ever been made from that sale. At this time Tuttle was indebted to defendant upon a promissory note, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. ReidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Lindley v. CrombieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Holmes v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Cooper v. FinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krelwitz v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API