Novak v. Steele
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFarr, J.
It is contended in the instant case that §3848 GC does not apply here-, for the reason that the assessment was made according to the foot front method, and it is urged in argument that this was an equalization of the assessment and that therefore no complaint was necessary to be lodged with any board of the municipality, because no equalization would be necessary, so it is said.
Attention is called to the case of Bashore v Brown, Treasurer, 108 Oh St 18, and to City of Cuyahoga Falls v Beck; et al, 110 Oh St 82. These cases do not make it clear . as to whether or not the proceeding under…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Conkle v. City of BellevueOhio Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Early v. Leatherman, Treas.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Pelton v. Board of County Commissioners of Wood Co.Wood County Court of Common Pleas · 1937