Legal Opinion

State of Okl. v. Harris

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 31, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-0475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge:

In this proceeding thirteen states 1 challenge the constitutionality of Section 1618, the so-called “pass-through” provision of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program of the Social Security Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. § 1382g. 2 Named as defendants are the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education .and Welfare (Department or HEW) and other officials of that agency. Declaratory and injunctive relief is sought against the HEW officials charged with the administration of the controverted provision and other provisions of the Act…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Oklahoma v. Richard S. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Reichenthal v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API