Legal Opinion

Bank of Baldwin v. Broussard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1929No. 382Published

1Opinion

ON THE MERITS

The district judge found that at the date of the pretended transfer of the rice to Banta, the debts Broussard owed amounted in the aggregate to the sum of $2,200. Counsel for defendant say that if Broussard owed the Smardon note, his total liabilities were about $2,100. We do not see why his obligation represented by the Smardon note should be eliminated from the debts Broussard owed at that time, which show that he was in debt at about the amount fixed by the district judge.

Counsel for Banta cite C. C. 1985, which says:

“By being in insolvent circumstances is meant, that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ventrilla v. TortoriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Swain v. Kirkpatrick Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. J. Grossman's Sons v. ChachereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  4. Lothrop v. GoudeauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  5. De Blanc v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API