In re Wells Fargo & Company Shareholder Derivative Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE WELLS FARGO & CO. Case No. 16-cv-05541-JST 8 SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: LITIGATION APPOINTMENT OF EXPERT 9 WITNESS PURSUANT TO RULE OF EVIDENCE 706 10 11 This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS 12 13 14 Now before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motions for final approval of a derivative action 15 settlement, ECF No. 276, and for attorney’s fees and expenses, ECF No. 277. The attorney’s fees 16 submitted for approval include fees for “‘contract’/’discovery’ attorneys (i.e., attorneys who are 17 not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.