Legal Opinion
Spells v. Extreme Nissan
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 1, 2004No. 2003-CA-2179PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
hDAVID S. GORBATY, Judge.
In this appeal, plaintiffs contend that the workers’ compensation court erred in rejecting their claims. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 5, 2002, alleged employer Smith-Carlton, LLC, IV, d/b/a Extreme Nissan (“Extreme Nissan”), its insurance carrier, CNA Insurance Companies, and claimants, Andrea Spells and her minor children (“Appellants”), proceeded to trial on Appellants’ Disputed Claim for Compensation. Appellants sought workers’ compensation death and burial benefits from Extreme…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Welch v. Newport IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Blade v. MervisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Timberlake v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Angulo v. ATH PAINTERS AND CONST., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Abraham v. De Felice Marine Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. PRIME, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Perry Smith v. Prime, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Rebecca Reed v. Lcs Corrections Services, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Reed v. LCS Corrections Services, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011