Merriman v. Harter
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LUJAN, Justice.
The plaintiff’s assignor, a foreign company, has its principal place of business' in Portland, Oregon. From there it gives instructions by correspondence. It has an agent in New Mexico whose duty is to solicit (canvass) pupils, whose applications for membership must be sent to the home office at Portland, Oregon, for acceptance. No contracts are closed here. No instruction is given here. No lessons or training material are sold here. The applicants receive their instructions through certain written lessons and training material mailed from Portland, Oregon. They send their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Alexander Film Co. v. PierceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Transradio Press Service, Inc. v. WhitmoreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- International Text Book Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
- International Text-book Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
3Cited by11 opinions
- Louise C. Pound v. Insurance Company of North America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Satterwhite v. StolzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Miller v. Mutual Benefit Health & Acc. Ass'n of OmahaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Eichel v. Goode, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.