Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 9, 1876Published

APPEAL FROM JOHNSON CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Coper:

This was an indictment for cheating in trade. The substance of the allegations in the indictment was that the appellees took some ginseng, which is an article of commerce, to John Bartram, a merchant who dealt in that article, and represented to- him that it was good, and sold it to him as such, and received payment therefor, when in fact they knew it was not, having themselves placed lead inside of the roots SO' as ho increase its weight, and in such manner that the lead could not be seen or discovered by ordinary observation, whereby they defrauded the said Bartram.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API