Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fitch v. Sam Tanksley Trucking Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1980No. 4515Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I dissent.

When intermixed with Rules of Appellate Procedure and judicial pronouncements, an attorney fee to be awarded Fitch is on a merry-go-round.

A. The trial court’s findings are conclusive on appeal.

In the Statement of Proceedings defendant did not challenge any findings of the trial court. Defendant did not object to the amount of the trial court’s award of an attorney fee until questioned by the court during the time the judgment was presented to the trial court. Rule 9(m)(2) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure for civil cases provides in part:... If any finding is challenged, it must…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mora v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Genuine Parts Co. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Marez v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API