Legal Opinion

Clark v. Mullen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Hall county. Tried below before George W. Post, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This action was brought by Mullen against Clark for goods alleged to have been sold to said Clark'and one Hayter, as partners, on and before the 14th day of September, 1878, and, at their request, delivered to Peter Frederick and another; that afterwards said Clark and Hayter dissolved partnership, Clark assuming the debt due for *482said goods and agreeing to pay the same. There is also a. claim for goods sold and delivered to Clark personally.. The answer admits that Clark and Hayter were partners-in 1878, but denies that the partnership continued to September 14th of that year. Admits that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKyring v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Baker v. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Texier v. GouinThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
  4. Edson v. DillayeNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ashland Land & Live-Stock Co. v. MayNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Mullen v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API