Legal Opinion

W. W. Kimball Co. v. Coon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of $254 for plaintiff, in an action brought in the district court for Olmsted county, and tried by Start, J., a jury being waived. The only defence pleaded was the discharge considered in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

July 9, 1889, defendants made an assignment' for the benefit of their creditors under the statute of 1881. Jn the proceedings the plaintiffs filed a claim against defendants, and it was allowed, and filed a release reciting the facts of the filing and proof of the claim, and in terms releasing the insolvents from “our and each of our claims.so filed with-said assignee other than such as may be paid under the provisions of said laws for the benefit of said insolvents, and hereby consent that judgment may be entered in said *46court discharging said insolvents, and each, of them, from claims by us…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National German-American Bank v. WilderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Adamson v. CheneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nicolay v. MallerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API