Legal Opinion

Manca, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 26, 1957No. C. D. 1874PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The involved merchandise consists of two types

of a device known as an “enlarger,” an instrument for taking a photograph of a subject in an enlarged size, imported under the trade names “Yaloy” and “Focomat.” It was classified under the provisions of paragraph 228 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem as “projection lenses * * * frames and ■mountings therefor.” Plaintiff claims that the articles at bar are properly classifiable under paragraph 1551 of said act, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. E. Leitz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Manca, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Manca, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Manca, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Metasco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API