Legal Opinion

Prouse v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2012No. COA12-160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs James W. Prouse and Carol D. Prouse appeal from orders granting dismissal motions filed by Defendants Bituminous Casualty Corporation and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. On appeal, Plaintiffs contend that their complaint did, in fact, state a claim for which relief could be granted. After careful consideration of Plaintiffs’ challenge to the trial court’s orders in light of the record and the applicable law, we conclude that the trial court’s orders should be affirmed.

I. Factual Background

On 27 May 2011, Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that, on or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Wood v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Oates v. Jag, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaska v. Progressive Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Duffy v. CampCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CampbellDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API