United States v. Lorenz Vilim Karlic
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
This case involves whether a defendant may be held to have knowingly, as opposed to recklessly, created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under section 2K1.4 of the Sentencing Guidelines.
I
In the predawn hours of three separate Mondays in May and June 1990, appellant Lorenz Vilim Karlic and his partner, Rodney Burl Smith, used homemade explosives to blast open the safes below night depository boxes in three banks in the area of Palm Springs, California. On each occasion Karlic stood guard at the front of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. Kenneth T. Hayward, and William B. Krause, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Katherine PappadopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. DisantoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Nam Tan NguyenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.