Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. . Murray

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 10, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff for nominal damages entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover damages for the breach of an express covenant for quiet enjoyment.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 10, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff for nominal damages entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover damages for the breach of an express covenant for quiet enjoyment. The appellant was the sublessee of ‘ ‘ the entire basement and subbasement in the building situate on the northwest corner of Broadway and Thirty-fourth street, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York,” together with the store. The claim for damages was for…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Sea-bury, J.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Times Square Improvement Co. v. Fleischmann Vienna Model Bakery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Fifth Avenue Building Co. v. KernochanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API