Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 1995No. 94-1152Published

1DissentErvin, Judge

Because I consider that the sole reason given for the upward departure sentence imposed on appellant is invalid under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll), as it is a factor relating to the instant offense for which he was not convicted, i.e., reckless driving, I respectfully dissent.

Appellant was convicted of armed robbery of a motor vehicle. The recommended guide*1178line sentence was seven to nine years and the permitted guideline sentence was 5½ to 12 years in prison. The court imposed an upward departure sentence of 25 years and gave as its sole reason for departure appellant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Scurry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. State v. TynerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API