Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Griffin

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 2, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John B. Riordan, J.

In this uncontested probate proceeding the named attorney-executor whose partner drafted the will dated August 1, 2002 requests that the disclosure statement required by SCPA 2307-a, *296signed by the decedent on the same day as the will, be accepted notwithstanding its failure to comply with the 2004 amendment to SCPA 2307-a.

Subdivision (3) of SCPA 2307-a sets forth “Models of acknowledgment of disclosure,” both of which models prior to 2004 contained merely three items of required disclosure to the testator. By the amendment made in 2004, an additional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Tonis v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. In re the Estate of TackleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MossNew York Surrogate's Court · 2008
  2. In re WintersNew York Surrogate's Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API