Legal Opinion

Juniata Accep. Corp., to Use v. Hoffman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1939No. Appeal, 18PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Baldrige, J.,

This appeal is from a judgment obtained by the use-plaintiff against the defendant in an action of trespass. The facts agreed upon and placed on record in the form of a case stated are, in substance, as follows.

On June 16, 1936, Wallace and Sarah Woodring under a bailment lease, in which Cupp Motor Company was bailor, came into possession of an automobile. The bailees agreed to pay as rent $295.02, $100 of which was paid upon delivery of the car and the balance was to be paid in monthly installments: one of $19.02 and the remaining eleven in the amount of $16 each. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smyth v. Fidel. Dep. Co. of Md.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commercial Banking Corp. v. Active Loan Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Gunzburger v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Hardman v. BrettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. Kramer Bros. Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. Gardner v. Freystown Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Burgis v. Philadelphia CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Commercial Banking Corp. v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API