Melo v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
WILLIAM K. SESSIONS III, District Judge.
Plaintiff Daniel Melo has filed a motion in limine seeking a pretrial order that will define the reasonable value of his medical bills to be the amount his healthcare providers charged him for his care, and not the amount that the providers received from his healthcare insurance; and exclude from evidence any testimony, references and/or arguments that his lost income should be limited to an after-tax amount. Pl.’s Mot. in Limine Re: Medical Specials & Lost Wages 1 (ECF No. 37). For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Acuar v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Wills v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- My Sister's Place v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jean Dedmon v. Debbie SteelmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- Weston v. AKHappytime, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Verci v. HighAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Armijo v. AffilionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Cooperman v. WoodardVermont Superior Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.