Legal Opinion
Sheffield v. Lack
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 22, 1988No. Civ. A. 3:87-0779PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
This is the second pro se application made to this Court for the federal writ of habeas corpus by the petitioner Mr. Hubert Sheffield. His first petition was dismissed for his failure to have exhausted available state-remedies. See, Hubert Sheffield, petitioner, v. Larry Lack, et al., respondents, civil action no. 3:87-0496, order of July 15, 1987.
Mr. Sheffield in his second habeas corpus petition has now eliminated apparently those claims which were held by this Court to be unexhausted. He claims now that he is in the custody of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999