Legal Opinion
New York State Division of Human Rights v. Parkview Auto Sales, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petition unanimously granted in part without costs and matter remitted to New York State Division of Human Rights for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination made by the Commissioner (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181-182), as well as the award of $125,000 for compensatory damages for mental anguish and humiliation (see, Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights, 181 AD2d 891, 894-895, amended 185 AD2d 889, lv denied 80 NY2d 762;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- 121-129 Broadway Realty, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Alverson v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Pioneer Group v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sudul v. Computer Outsourcing Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Allender v. MercadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Parkview Auto Sales, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994