Legal Opinion

Gold v. Office of the State Auditor

West Virginia Court of Claims

Decided October 26, 1982No. CC-82-192aPublished

1Per curiam

The claimants are attorneys who served as counsel for criminal indigents in juvenile, misdemeanor, or felony proceed*248ings pursuant to the provisions of West Virginia Code, Chapter 51, Article 11. Claimants’ fees were denied by the respondent because the fund was exhausted.

The claimants also served as counsel for indigents in Mental Hygiene hearings by appointment of the Circuit Court of Marshall County, West Virginia, pursuant to the provisions of West Virginia Code, Chapter 27, Article 5. This statute provides for the payment of mental hygiene commissioner fees and attorney fees out of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swartling v. Office of the State AuditorWest Virginia Court of Claims · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API