Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

International Business Machines Corp. v. Evans

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 20, 1995No. S95A0072Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenham, Presiding Justice

The majority sets forth that neither DOAS nor its commissioner can rely on the doctrine of sovereign immunity as a shield from IBM’s suit seeking injunctive relief. I do not believe that DOAS and its commissioner are so inextricably entwined that they can be painted with the same broad stroke. Instead, I am of the opinion that the 1990 constitutional amendment (1983 Ga. Const., Art. I, Sec. II, Par. IX) places DOAS, as a department of the state, within the folds of the cloak of sovereign immunity, and the question of the commissioner’s immunity from suit is determinable only after further…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Hennessy v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Joyce v. Van ArsdaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. State Board of Education v. DrurySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Dennison Manufacturing Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API