Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Donaldson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1914No. 5960Published

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “D,” No. 87,922. Hon. Porter Parker, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

His Honor JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Plaintiff seeks to confirm a tax -sale in which the property is described as “Square 57 in the Third District of New Orleans, assessed to Widow Jos. IT. Debergue-.” The assessment roll adds, that the property is situated “at Milneburg,” but mentions neither measurements nor boundaries, and refers to no plan.

A description reading ‘ ‘ Square 57 in the Third District of New Orleans, at Milneburg, ” mentioning neither meas*81urements nor boundaries and referring to no plan, does not physically describe any particular…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heirs v. MartinezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Roussel v. Railways Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Vannetta v. BusbeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. Newman v. GleasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API