Legal Opinion

Frates v. Frates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*814The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court’s pendente lite award of child support and maintenance was inadequate is without merit. The purpose of a pendente lite award is to “ensure that a needy spouse is provided with funds for his or her support and reasonable needs and those of the children in his or her custody” (Pascale v Pascale, 226 AD2d 439, 440 [1996]; see Mueller v Mueller, 61 AD3d 652, 653 [2009]). Moreover, the proper remedy for any perceived inequity in a pendente lite award is a speedy trial (see Anderson v Anderson, 50 AD3d 610 [2008]).

Here, in addition to awarding the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pascals v. PascalsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. McGarrity v. McGarrityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Mueller v. MuellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Anderson v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finnan v. FinnanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Moreira v. MoreiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API