Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. National Container Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1942PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

We think it was error to grant summary judgment to the defendants-respondents.

The plaintiff chose an action at law as his remedy to recover money damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the defendants’ fraud and conspiracy. As our decision must rest upon the pleadings and supporting affidavits, we pass directly to a consideration of facts alleged.

The defendant National Container Corporation — to which reference will be made as “ National ”— is a manufacturer of corrugated boxes. Its stockholders, directors and officers are the three individual defendants, Kipnis, Ginsberg and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Sager v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Gould v. Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Kamerman v. CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Aaron Ferer & Sons Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Clearview Concrete Products Corp. v. S. Charles Gherardi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Bilotti v. Accurate Forming Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Newin Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Lucio v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API