Legal Opinion

United States v. Vitasafe Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 2, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

This action was instituted against the defendant, a nationwide distributor of vitamins, to recover civil penalties and to enjoin continued violations of a cease and desist order issued by the Federal Trade Commission. 1

The proceeding before the Commission charged a violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act by advertising in newspapers, magazines and other national media an allegedly deceptive “thirty day free trial” offer as an inducement to the public to purchase “Vitasafe C. F. Capsules.” The charge also included allegations that the defendant was guilty of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Yoffe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. JB Williams Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. United States v. ACB Sales & Service, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1984
  4. United States v. Vitasafe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. Ancorp National Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API