Legal Opinion

Harris v. Crawley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1910No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Case by Bernice Harris, by nest friend, against Peter Crawley for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant, Crawley, for injuries caused by a fall from a “carousal” or “merry-go-round” in operation at a fair. She was a girl in her teens, who lived with her father, a widower, and cared for the house. She was permitted to recover damages for medical attendance, and for ‘ ‘ damage in her daily avocation. ” We feel constraifaed *384to reverse the judgment for the latter reason, as the right to recover for her loss of ability to work during her minority belongs to her father, unless she has been emancipated, which did not appear. She should not have been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reeder v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Dzwonkiewicz's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Harris v. CrawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Westrate v. SchipperMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Grim v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API