Legal Opinion · Dissent

B.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 13, 1993No. 92-1856Published

1DissentW. Sharp, Judge

I respectfully dissent. In my view, that part of the juvenile escape statute under which B.H. was adjudicated to be a delinquent, section 39.061, Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), is unconstitutional for the reasons stated by the First District Court of Appeal in D.P. v. State, 597 So.2d 952 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). See also State v. Davis, 619 So.2d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Accordingly, I would reverse B.H.’s adjudication. I also think we should certify a conflict with D.P., as well as R.A.H. v. State, 614 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Both D.P., and the child in this case, were adjudicated guilty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. State v. WershowSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. In the Interest of D.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. R.A.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API