Schrimpf v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal iii error from Circuit Court of Davidson County. W. K. McAlister, J. Action brought by Schrimpf against the Tennessee Manufacturing Company, for services rendered the defendant by the plaintiff’s minor son. There was judgment below in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtTurney, C. J.
Plaintiff sues the defendant for twenty-eight dollars, claimed to be due for the services of his minor son, rendered under a contract made by the father. There is no dispute as to the amount. The defense is put upon a clause in the contract as follows»: “Every individual desiring or intending to, leave the employ of the company will be required to give two weeks’ notice, . and his other engagement with the company will not be considered fulfilled until he or she has worked out such notice; and should any person leave the employ of the company without giving and working the two weeks’ notice…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Condon v. KemperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- City of New Britain v. New Britain Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Tennessee Manufacturing Co. v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Nashville v. Nashville Traction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Elzey v. City of WintersetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.