Legal Opinion

State v. BH

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 13, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

870 A.2d 273 (2005)

183 N.J. 171

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

B.H., Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 28, 2004.

Decided April 13, 2005.

Maura K. Tully, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Michael J. Confusione, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney).

2Opinion of the Court · LaVECCHIAJustice LaVECCHIA

A jury convicted defendant, B.H., of first-degree aggravated sexual assault and third-degree endangering the welfare of a child, for having engaged in sexual…

3Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Timothy Duane Arcoren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API