Bilby v. McKenzie
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Stanton L. Carter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff commenced proceedings in mandamus against defendant McKenzie, treasurer of the city of Fresno, to compel the payment of certain warrants issued for work performed upon the sewers of the city in the month of May, 1895. The claims represented by the warrants had been duly allowed and ordered paid by the board of trustees, and warrants therefor had been properly drawn upon the treasurer.
It was alleged that there was in the sewer fund of the city, and not otherwise appropriated, a sum largely in excess of the amount of the warrants.
Defendant McKenzie, in his return and answer, showed…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- County of Tehama v. SissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- State Ex Rel. Keefe v. CottonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Birch v. MonroeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.