Legal Opinion

Linlor v. Conn

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 28, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01806Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES LINLOR, Case No.: 22-cv-1806-RBM-KSC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX 14 JUSTIN CONN, in his individual capacity; PARTE MOTION TO NAME AND LEONARD FLETES, in his individual 15 ADD PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN capacity; and JOHN DOES 1–5, JOHN DOE #1; 16 Defendants. 17 (2) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE; 18 AND 19 (3) DENYING AS MOOT 20 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 21 DISMISS, MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT, AND 22 REQUEST FOR ORDER 23 DECLARING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. 24…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API