Legal Opinion
Hall v. Ferguson
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 1935No. Civ. 1176PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARDEN, J., pro tem.
Action to quiet title to three pieces of real property.
W. J. Ferguson and Mary Ellen Ferguson, defendants, were formerly husband and wife. A final decree of divorce was entered September 4, 1915, in an action between them wherein, among other things, it was adjudged that there was no community property. At that time Mary Ellen Ferguson held title to two pieces of the property involved in this action by virtue of a deed from W. J. Ferguson. By deed dated March 4, 1922, she conveyed said property to W. J. Ferguson. This deed was not recorded until March 8, 1923. On December…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mowry v. HeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Gates v. PendletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Lewis v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Elliott v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Cranmer v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Shaver v. CanfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hill v. DonnellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Koon v. SherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Resh v. PillsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.