Legal Opinion

McKibben v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 17, 1918No. 2366PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; J. Warren Davis, Judge. At Law. Action by Robert J. McKibben against the Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit brought by Robert J. McKibben, a citizen of New Jersey, against the Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company, a corporation of Pennsylvania. It was for personal injuries sustained by McKibben while working as brakeman on defendant’s train, and which injuries, it was alleged, were caused by the railroad’s negligence. The negligence charged was, inter alia, defendant’s failure to furnish a proper coupler in compliance with the federal Safety Appliance Act. On the trial, the plaintiff recovered a verdict, and, on entry of judgment thereon, defendant sued…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The Fred E. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coleman Motor Co., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. KlingeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Harry Russell Briggs v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  4. Griffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  5. United States v. Kum Seng SeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API