Legal Opinion

In re Swan & Finch Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 2, 1919No. 1235, Patent AppealsPublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Application by the Swan & Finch Company to register a trade-mark. From a Patent Office decision, refusing registration, the applicant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office refusing to register the words “Slo Flo” as a trade-mark “for lubricating grease for high speed machines”; the ground of the decision being that the words are descriptive of character or quality.

The Examiner pointed out that “the essential properties of lubricating grease for high speed machinery are a high flashing point and viscosity, or the quality of flowing slowly.” Applicant evidently had these properties in mind when, a few days prior to the filing of the application, it adopted this mark.

The decision is affirmed.

Affirm…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Franklin Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Fashionit Sweater Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  2. No-D-Ka Dentifrice Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928
  3. Application of Toledo Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  4. Application of Diamond Fertilizer CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Feil v. American Serum Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API