Legal Opinion · Dissent
Miller v. Miller
Montana Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1948No. 8764Published
1DissentJustice Metcalf
The complaint sets forth two causes of action, one to establish a deed and the second to quiet title. The decree of the trial court recites the facts as follows:
“That on or about the 11th day of June, 1935, and prior thereto, the above named plaintiff, Phillip W. Miller, was the owner and in possession of the following described real property, situated in the County of Pondera, State of Montana, to-wit: The South Half (S%) and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW^NW^) of Section Twenty-five (25), Township Twenty-eight (28) North Range One (1) West of the Montana Meridian,…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
- Tayloe v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.