Parkus v. Credit Clearing House
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District. Action by Herman Parkus against the Credit Clearing House. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtDayton, J.
This is an action to recover for services as stenographer, rendered upon the employment of an attorney retained and. paid by defendant. The attorney testified that with the consent of *99defendant’s representative plaintiff was engaged to take minutes in a certain proceeding. The value of the services is not questioned, nor was the attorney’s testimony corroborated. Defendant’s representative specifically denied the testimony of the attorney, and stated that defendant had in its employ a stenographer competent for the work, whom said attorney knew. Plaintiff failed to establish his cause of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sherry v. ProalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908